It’s the fourth round of the FA Cup this weekend. Not
that it matters to Queen’s Park Rangers whose aversion to cup competitions means
they bail out at the first possible opportunity. At least this season they rolled
over for a decent Everton side; a shade more palatable than being beaten at
home to a team representing Vauxhall Motors as they did not so long ago. But
whoever the opposition the club rarely gives a toss about any cup competition.
It’s a real pity fighting relegation, chasing promotion or
even scrabbling over league positions is now the be-all and end-all to clubs. Winning
a cup doesn’t carry the prestige it once did but I’d love it, love it, to see
my team do it. Just once would be enough. When I kicked a tennis ball in the garden against the side
of the garage as a kid I dreamt of scoring the winning cup final goal. All normal kids did. I
couldn’t think of anything better in life; to such a degree I even imagined
dying the next morning and the club erecting a statue outside the ground in my
honour. Bit of an extreme fantasy for a child and one which became a greater dilemma
once I became more interested in music and agonised over whether I’d prefer a number one
single instead. In the increasingly unlucky event I achieve either of these (previously considered) monumental achievements it's doubtful many will even notice.
Back in 1967 (before I was born) when QPR won the League
Cup – to date their only major honour - cups were still a big deal. As a third
division side Rangers beat first division West Bromwich Albion 3-2 after being
two-down at half time in front of 98,000 people at Wembley Stadium. How’s that
for a fairy tale?
I’d wager the two young fans on the cover of the 9th
September 1967 issue of Football League
Review were there. It’s an evocative snapshot - by Peter Robinson - from a bygone era. The fan on the
left appears to have stuck a number 8 on the back of their mum’s stripy dress,
pinched the waist in with a length of rope, and decorated a hat pinched from the
local butcher. The fan on the right sports a variation on a traditional bobble
hat, painted one of their dad’s old work shirts, and has scrawled the
names of the team on back in felt-tip: Springett, Hazell, Larazus, Keen, Morgan, Marsh etc.
Back then one knew the team, it was always the same. There weren't massive
squads or players with a number 42 on their shirt who saw 20 minutes of playing time. Even as late as 1981 when
Aston Villa won the first division they only used 14 players all season.
Players didn’t get injured despite being allowed to kick seven shades of shit
out of each other. The metatarsal, thankfully, had yet to be invented.
Football League Review
started life in 1965 as Soccer Review,
changed its name the following year until 1972, and spent its last three years
as League Football. Flicking through
the 20 pages in this issue (50p from Walthamstow Wood Street Indoor Market last weekend) it’s interesting to see how things have changed and
how they’ve stayed the same. I can’t remember the last bout of violence I
witnessed in a ground but in 1967: “The Football League and its clubs are
concerned to root out hooligans, to see they receive punishment that fits their
crime. But they are also aware that the vast majority of spectators are
immaculately behaved and are equally concerned to clear out the louts”, reads
Harry Brown’s typically pompous editorial.
One of the causes of trouble identified in a separate
column was “the factions who flaunt flags and banners simply to annoy or enrage
rival supporters. They incite passion, and passion starts brawls, I have seen
many a flare-up on the terraces ignited in this way. So have you”. Of course nowadays,
as anyone who has had the misfortune to step inside Stamford Bridge knows,
clubs – well, Chelsea – create huge plastic banners with slogans
like “JT CAPTAIN, LEADER, LEGEND”, in support of their odious lump, guaranteed - with just those few words - to boil the blood of opposing supporters. So, it does work, passions can be incited by a banner, even inside a soulless corporate shitbox.
The gamesmanship of footballers was also under scrutiny
in 1967 with complaints of “childish and petulant behaviour of many players”.
Arguing with referees’ decisions, flashes of ill-temper, gesturing, kicking the
ball away and time wasting are all highlighted as detracting from the spectators' enjoyment. “What would happen if a club decided to cut out all this
malarkey, and play the game in a proper gentlemanly spirit?” asked Mr. Frank
Hales from Oxford. I dunno Frank but just you wait until 2014.
Increased footballers’ wages were already an issue of concern and
how “pound notes on the eyeballs blunt enthusiasm for leather footballs”. Manchester United's manager, Mr.
Matt Busby, did not agree, claiming star salaries were the making of the modern
footballer. “He is a smart, sophisticated man about town… soccer is really a
profession with a future now”.
Amongst the consternation and brow-beating, light relief was provided with a little something for the ladies who each week got to vote for
their most attractive footballer. This particular week, Georgie Best had to
concede top spot to Sunderland’s Jim Baxter. Glaswegian “Slim Jim” wouldn’t have been my idea of a dreamboat but he did have a cool modish haircut and was something of a character, famous for drinking himself unconscious on Friday night and then turning
in a great performance come three o’clock on Saturday. Hardly the epitome of smart sophistication but impressive nonetheless and guess who now has a statue in their home town? Yes, Jim Baxter.
Right then, who's for a game of three-and-in? Bring some jumpers for goalposts. Bagsy Charlie Austin.
|
Slim Jim Baxter, Sunderland & Scotland |